This one is one of the failure I made that don’t look like a arch, and not considering about saving price.
This one is much more cheaper, but it still didn’t distribute the load like an arch, is too flat.
This one’s price is almost half the price as last time, but there are too much compression on the top, still not working
after adjusting the thickness on the top and the supporting part in the middle, the bridge’s price decrease and it works.
I take Wei-ting’s suggestions to use QTS instead of carbon steel, at the start the price immediately go up, but i Change the top part to hollow and the price reached 212k, after adjusting the thickness to the extent of this structure it reached $194,564.75, great improvement.
Characters: Snowball, Napoleon, Boxer, and Clover, the cows.
Scene: Jones was walking on his farm. The animals were angry because Jones went to Willingdon and got drunk at the bar overnight, so the animals weren’t fed yesterday. The animals rush up to Jones and expel him from the farm.
Screen Recording 2026-05-04 181322 that is final edition
From this Alice 3 tutorial I learn how to use inheritance to synchronize every biped character for the same procedure rather than repeating the procedure for every character. Inheritance lets every object copy the procedure without making individual commands for every object. After setting up the scene, I click on the drop-down, go to biped, put my biped commands on, and go back to my first method to put biped commands on and test it out. What happens is the child and the wolf move, but the chicken doesn’t move, and they only do the dance moves once. I go back and check the video, and it reminds me of the difference between categories: the child and the wolf are bipeds, and the chicken is an animal. In my first procedure there is no “do it together” function. I left the chicken there for comparison and put the procedures in the “do it together” function. After all, the synchronized dance is inherited by the bipeds, and the dance is ok.
From today’s Alice 3 tutorial, I discovered 3 more important skills in this program: moving objects, changing the transparency of the object, and moving individual body parts of the object. It took me a while to understand how I could do the above motions because there were advanced skills in the program I should discover. Following the tutorial, the long list of body parts, the switch between tabs and typing methods, and the code confused me again. These setbacks have taught me more and given me more proficiency in the area; I found support from my classmates and reviewed the tutorial again and again. Now I have finally figured it out and am able to produce the video scene above.
Today Mr. Robert introduced us to a coding program called Alice 3. I learned the basics of Alice 3 and how to move and make objects talk in an animation. Alice 3 has 2 modes: one is Edit Code, and one is Setting Scene. Edit Code is very similar to Scratch, which has blocks for a variety of functions, like making characters talk and move in the animation. Setting Scene is a mode for placing the characters on the scene and positioning them at the starting position of the scene.
Who made or hosts it and why that matters. “Jose Esteves, this help viewers determine which information is reliable enough to be trust.”
Are sources named on screen or in the description? “Sources are named in description.”
Are limits or uncertainty admitted? “Jose Esteves did admitted limits and uncertainty about preparing students for their future jobs and using Technology.”
Does visual polish replace evidence? “Visual polish can’t replace evidence for people trust in logic instead of what they see.”
Logos, the logic test
State the main claim in one sentence. “Technology is the biggest force of change ever.”
List the evidence given, numbers, examples, or processes. “Evidence: There are over 8.5 Billion people searches on google per day, Numbers: 8.5 billion, Examples: none, Processes: search on google”
Are key definitions clear? like year, place, or units. “yes, all of them are clear enough”
Any leap from correlation to causation? “yes, all of these lead to why technology is the biggest force of change ever.”
One missing counterexample or alternative view. “Biotechnology will cost human be more depending on Artificial Intelligence and then lost capability one by one.”
My claim at [0:04] says “There has never been a bigger force for change than technology.”; [GSMA] reports “The environmental impact of GM crops is important with regard to creating food security in developing countries. Genetically modified crops can potentially fail to germinate; kill organisms other than pests that are beneficial to plants and reduce soil fertility; and potentially transfer insecticidal properties or virus resistance to wild relatives of the crop species.” for [2009]. Verdict: Accurate, Outdated, or Unclear.
Ethos, the credibility test
Who made or hosts it and why that matters? “Matt Cutts, this help viewers determine which information is reliable enough to be trust.”
Are sources named on screen or in the description? “Sources are named in description.”
Are limits or uncertainty admitted? ” Matt Cutts did admitted limits and uncertainty about preparing students for their future jobs and using Technology.”
Does visual polish replace evidence? “Visual polish can’t replace evidence for people trust in logic instead of what they see.”
Logos, the logic test
State the main claim in one sentence. “When you do a Google search, you aren’t actually searching the web, you’re searching Google’s index of the web, or at least as much of it we can find.”
List the evidence given, numbers, examples, or processes. “Evidence: none, Numbers: 200 questions/60 Miles per hour/Examples: How fast a cheetah can run/Processes: spiders-start by fetching by a few web pages then they follow the links on those pages and fetch the pages they point to, and follow all the links on those pages and fetch the pages they link to and so on, until they’ve indexed a pretty big chunk of the web.”
Are key definitions clear, like year, place, or units. “yes, all of them are clear.
Any leap from correlation to causation? “yes, like the spiders.”
One missing counterexample or alternative view. “how long will this process be use?”
My claim at [0:04] says “When you do a Google search, you aren’t actually searching the web, you’re searching Google’s index of the web, or at least as much of it we can find.”; [ITU] reports “Innovation and digital transformation for a sustainable world captures the ongoing global efforts to harness the power of technology for positive and sustainable change.” for [year]. Verdict: Accurate, Outdated, or Unclear.
A new habit, consider the use of key words to let search engines function faster.
people who have lack of information should see Did You Know 2025; people who are struggle of why his search engine load so slow should watch How Search Works.
